review
Adversarial senior review of the spec before any code is written. Constructs a skeptical reviewer whose authority comes from the codebase, §R research, and live best-practice — then tries to REFUTE the spec, not rubber-stamp it. Every finding cites evidence (file:line or source); unverifiable ones are flagged. Survivors harden §V; the run ends in an explicit go / no-go gate. Triggers before building anything high-blast-radius, when the user says "review the spec", "red-team this", "is this plan sound", "senior review", or invokes /ck:review.
· 实时索引
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt，粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里，让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
想先保存到本地？可下载 RuleHub 当前索引到的 GitHub 仓库压缩包。
下载 Zip| name | review |
| description | Adversarial senior review of the spec before any code is written. Constructs a |
review
Adversarial senior review of the spec before any code is written. Constructs a
skeptical reviewer whose authority comes from the codebase, §R research, and
live best-practice — then tries to REFUTE the spec, not rubber-stamp it. Every
finding cites evidence (file:line or source); unverifiable ones are flagged.
Survivors harden §V; the run ends in an explicit go / no-go gate. Triggers
before building anything high-blast-radius, when the user says "review the
spec", "red-team this", "is this plan sound", "senior review", or invokes
/ck:review.
When to use
Use this skill when the user needs help with tasks related to review.
Guidelines
- Follow repository conventions in
JuliusBrussee/cavekit - Prefer minimal, focused changes
- Validate outputs before finishing